Urban areas are plagued by the eyesore and safety hazard of double utility poles. Addressing this issue requires a deeper understanding of why double poles exist, the scope of the problem, safety concerns, and effective solutions. Tools like Fulcrum can significantly streamline the management of this problem.
Why double utility poles exist
Double utility poles often result from utility upgrades and infrastructure improvements. When utility companies install new, taller poles to support additional cables or modernize infrastructure, the old poles are left in place until all utilities have transferred their equipment. This process can be slow due to coordination challenges among multiple utility providers, regulatory approvals, and logistical constraints. Consequently, old poles can remain for extended periods, creating double poles.
Additionally, double poles can result from the original pole becoming compromised, whether through car accidents, extreme weather, or simply routine deterioration. Instead of replacing the problem pole entirely, utilities often attach a new pole next to the original pole to keep it upright. Unfortunately, this temporary fix often becomes permanent.
The scope of the problem
Double utility poles are widely considered unsightly and contribute to clutter in urban landscapes. However, it’s challenging to accurately determine their quantity in any specific area, as there seems to be little motivation to monitor these poles closely.
The one place that does have an online database of double utility poles is Massachusetts — and that is only because state law requires removal of double poles within 90 days. As an aside, the law doesn’t appear to be helping much: as of February 2024, Massachusetts had 18,917 double utility poles, up from 14,931 in 2019, and almost all of them (16,749) have been in place for longer than the statutory 90-day limit.
While we don’t have exact numbers, double utility poles are a common sight in cities everywhere. They are universally disliked due to their negative impact on the visual appeal and structural integrity of urban spaces.
Safety concerns
The presence of double utility poles leads to several safety issues. These poles obstruct roadways, complicate maintenance tasks, and pose risks during severe weather conditions.
Moreover, double poles interfere with emergency responses and the routine work of utility crews, increasing the risk of accidents and delays. Finally, double poles also hinder future construction and infrastructure projects. Clearly, the swift removal of outdated poles is crucial for maintaining the safety — and aesthetic appeal — of urban infrastructure.
Double pole removal strategies
Addressing the issue of double utility poles requires practical solutions that leverage technology and process improvements. Here are some key strategies:
- Field data collection and management. Tools like the Fulcrum field data collection platform can revolutionize the way utility companies handle pole removal and replacement. Fulcrum allows for real-time data collection, geolocation tracking, and status updates. This makes it easier to manage and monitor the entire process. Additionally, the platform enables field workers to document the condition of poles and report issues. They can also update the progress of pole removal. These features ensure transparency and accountability throughout the project.
- Collaboration and coordination. Effective communication and coordination between utility companies, local governments, and contractors are essential for managing double utility pole remediation projects. Utilizing digital platforms for field data collection can streamline these projects, making it easier to track progress and resolve issues. This approach also provides the necessary data to maintain databases like the one in Massachusetts, ensuring that remediation projects stay on schedule.
- Prioritization and scheduling. Identifying and prioritizing poles based on their condition and location is crucial for effective management. Factors such as traffic volume, proximity to roadways, and the degree of damage should be considered when scheduling pole removals. This prioritization helps in addressing the most critical issues first, minimizing risks and enhancing public safety.
- Legislative support and incentives. Implementing supportive legislation and offering incentives can enhance compliance with removal timelines for double utility poles. Although strict enforcement often encounters resistance, as demonstrated in Knox County, Kentucky, and some laws, like those in Massachusetts (above) are frequently overlooked, providing incentives such as tax breaks or funding for compliance efforts can encourage utility companies to take proactive steps.
Conclusion
The problem of double utility poles in urban areas is both an eyesore and a complex logistical puzzle. By harnessing innovative tools like field data collection platforms, such as Fulcrum, and promoting teamwork among all stakeholders, utility companies can effectively address this challenge. Supportive legislation — in the form of both the carrot of tax incentives and the stick of regulatory fines — also plays a crucial role in keeping things moving.
Removing these redundant poles not only boosts public safety but also spruces up the cityscape, making urban environments more functional and attractive. With the right mix of technology, collaboration, and policy support, we can clear the clutter of double poles, paving the way for safer, more streamlined urban landscapes.
Ready to see how Fulcrum can transform your utility management? Schedule a free demo today and start simplifying your double pole remediation projects.